Testing the hypothesis - part 2
To reiterate the topic, the opportunity I have decided to pursue is the development of a more reliable and attractive transnational railway system in the U.S. similar to what many other developed countries have.
There are a few groups of people that exist outside of the
general need for my opportunity, and therefore would not find it necessary for
this venture to come to fruition. The most explicit kind of person that I encountered
while performing my interviews would be the two people I interviewed that simply
are not interested in public transportation. Their preference of being in their
own space in their own car far outweighs the potential benefits of having accessible
public transportation, and the concept of cost differences are negligible to
them. The second reason I encountered that would have someone exist outside the
boundaries of my proposed opportunity involves those who do not travel
frequently enough whatsoever to find a need for a transnational transit
system. One of the people I interviewed is a UF student who also was born in
raised with their family in Alachua county, thus the frequency in which they
would need to travel long distances is very low. The fourth person I interviewed
had a similar reason, but she lives in Tampa and is a mother of two. With her
daughter at 3 and son only 1 year old, she doesn’t leave the city often and
when she does it is only a short distance to Orlando to visit family. The last
person I interviewed was an anomaly, but still relevant nonetheless. This
person is an executive at a financial firm and in the past 4 years began using
private airline travel for trips between cities. Since he has the financial
ability to use this resource, and finds no faults with it, he doesn’t feel the
need to have a different type of transnational travel.
|
Inside the boundary
|
Outside the boundary
|
|
Who: Adults (ages 18+) that travel
|
Who: Children, people wary of public transport, people
satisfied with current means of travel
|
|
What: An affordable, accessible travel alternative
|
What: A method that is quicker than planes or more private
than cars
|
|
Why: The saturation of cars in the U.S. has caused traffic
to exceed infrastructure capacity, the country is large and hard to travel long
distances either affordably or comfortably
|
Alternative explanation: the U.S. has been built around
cars and their use is an integral part of the nation’s culture and operations
|
Hey Archie,
ReplyDeleteI think its great that you are identifying a problem and a solution that has a visible example of how the final product should be by looking at the other countries that have already implemented a transnational railway. Considering how the US is a lot larger than most countries with a transnational railway, I would be curious to see how it all plays out.
Archie,
ReplyDeletePersonally I would absolutely love to have a transportation system like those in Europe. I do believe that people that have used them might appreciate them more, where as people that haven't ever utilized them only know the world of cars. I also believe that it would really help with our gas emission epidemic. This would save people a lot of money and that is a really attractive feature to have.